The Epiphany Brief
Issue #3 | 3 April 2026
|
|
Hey {{person.firstName}},
The perfect offer and the wrong buyers
In 2022, I spent about nine months working closely with my dear friend Toby Moore. Toby is one of those rare people who connects dots nobody else can see. He'd previously run a successful marketing agency, he designs everything from bespoke visibility programmes for astronauts to model skate parks to youth centre facilities, and he's a world-class finger skateboard champion. That should give you a sense of the kind of mind we're talking about.
So much of Toby's work centres on helping people find the right words. And that's exactly what he did for me. Through those months together, what emerged was a clear, compelling offer: three months of content from a single day of filming. Easy to understand. Easy to get excited about. Clients, prospects, and people in my network finally got it. It brought in dozens of projects.
And then a pattern started forming that took me a while to recognise.
People were coming in excited about the deliverable. Three months of videos, brilliant. They came with their own ideas about what to say, how to say it, and where to post it. What they wanted was someone to hold the camera and provide the edit. What they didn't want was someone challenging them on their messaging. Or asking how these videos would fit into their daily operations. Or pointing out that without a strategy connecting the videos to a customer journey, they were creating beautiful things that would sit on a hard drive after two weeks on LinkedIn.
They were hiring a vendor. I was thinking as a strategic partner. And neither of us had the language to see the gap.
|
|
Someone gave me the vocabulary
Over the past year, my business strategist Liana Fricker has done something I couldn't do for myself. She named the problem. She helped me understand the difference between being a vendor and being a strategic partner. And once I had those two words, I could see the pattern everywhere.
A vendor delivers what you ask for. A strategic partner challenges what you're asking for.
A vendor is evaluated on speed and price. A strategic partner is evaluated on what changed for the client six months later.
A vendor gets replaced when someone cheaper shows up. A strategic partner becomes harder to replace the longer you work together, because they understand your business in ways a new person would take months to replicate.
I'd had this clarity sitting in front of me for years. I was thinking as a strategic partner, talking about deliverables like a vendor, and confused about why the projects that came in didn't feel right. My messaging was positioning me as one thing while my mind was working as another.
And I think a lot of you might recognise that feeling.
|
|
What the gap actually costs you
Two years ago, someone I'd been in contact with for eighteen months finally had budget to work together. They ran a networking group in London. Genuine fan of my work. Commented on everything I posted, championed my causes. To make the numbers work, I cut my fees by more than half.
What started as a multi-part strategic series became filming vox pops of attendees at their events. The founder didn't want to be front and centre. I knew that approach wouldn't build their authority or bring in leads. I went along with it anyway. The customer is always right.
Two days before the event, the strategy had changed completely. We went in underprepared. Still executed to a high standard, because that's what we do. The client still wasn't satisfied. They wanted a situation where they said, "I'll know it when I see it."
If you've ever worked with a client who has no clarity on what they want but absolute clarity on what they don't like, you know that feeling. An endless loop of revisions with no respect for your time or expertise.
That was the last time I took on work as a vendor.
But the cost wasn't just that one project. The previous year, I'd produced about sixty beautifully made videos for a consultant called Jon Barnes. People compared the cinematography to Big Think. Six months later, I asked for a testimonial. Jon loved the videos. He just hadn't seen tangible results. His videos lacked calls to action. They weren't targeting specific pain points. There was no structure for measuring whether they'd actually moved his business forward.
Beautiful work. No measurable return. That's the vendor trap. You make gorgeous things and hope the results follow.
|
|
What strategic partners actually build
This is the part that took me four years to piece together. The shift from vendor to strategic partner isn't about raising your prices and hoping people pay. It's structural. There are specific things you need to have in place before anyone will trust you enough to hand over control.
Daniel Priestley describes this as the difference between a functional worker, someone evaluated on processes and pressured on price, and a vital one: someone aligned with results and transformations. When I look back at the projects that went wrong, at least three of these six elements were missing every time.
1. Long-form thinking, published where people can find it
Rory Sutherland said something recently that landed hard for me: "Don't sell what you do. Sell how you think." A vendor sells deliverables. A strategic partner demonstrates their thinking publicly through considered videos, articles, or presentations. The 2025 Edelman-LinkedIn report found that 71% of hidden buyers said thought leadership was more effective than traditional marketing at demonstrating a company's potential value. And 64% trusted it more than product sheets when assessing capabilities. Your published thinking is doing the selling before you've said a word in a meeting.
2. Language that describes outcomes, not deliverables
This is what Toby helped me find. The words that made people understand. But here's the part I missed: those words attracted people who wanted the deliverable, not the strategic thinking. If your website, your LinkedIn headline, and your elevator pitch still describe the thing you produce, you'll keep attracting people who want a vendor. Your language needs to describe what changes for your client, not what you hand them.
3. A visible methodology
When a prospect can see your process, your named frameworks, and the structure behind how you approach their problem, something shifts. They stop evaluating you on price and start evaluating you on fit. Priestley calls this "productising your value." A named methodology, a diagnostic tool, a clear set of phases. The difference between "we'll figure it out as we go" and "here's the structured journey, here are the milestones, and here's how we'll measure it." The first gives a client anxiety. The second gives them enough confidence to hand you the reins.
4. Evidence that connects the work to results
This is where Jon Barnes taught me the most valuable lesson. Beautiful work without measurable outcomes is a vendor portfolio. In a previous edition, I mentioned a wellness practitioner who'd heard me speak at an event and wanted to work together before eventually hesitating. She was concerned there would be no way to measure the return. No KPIs. No way to de-risk the investment. Those two experiences, Jon's videos without attribution and the wellness professional's hesitation without metrics, sent me on a mission to build a proper measurement framework into everything we do.
5. A consistent cadence that compounds over time
A newsletter. Short-form posts. Showing up in someone's feed or inbox every week. One post doesn't do it. Fifty of them, consistently, over a year, does. In the previous edition I talked about Gary Vaynerchuk's Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook and the principle of sharing genuine value before you ask for anything. That philosophy applies directly here. Every useful thing you share is a deposit in a trust account. When you eventually make the ask, whether that's a proposal, a pitch, or a price, the balance is there. Without it, you're a stranger asking for money.
6. A diagnostic tool that starts the conversation
A strategic partner doesn't wait to be hired. They offer a way for prospects to self-assess. A readiness quiz, an audit canvas, a diagnostic. Something that gives the prospect genuine insight into where they stand and, in the process, shows them how the strategic partner thinks. The prospect walks away having learned something real. And they associate that clarity with you.
|
|
Why you probably can't see it yourself
I want to say something about the roles Toby and Liana played, because I think it matters.
Toby helped me see what I was offering and find the words for it. Liana helped me see who I was becoming and find the positioning for it. Both were necessary. Both were things I couldn't have reached on my own. I was too close to my own work to see the distance between what I was saying and what I was actually doing.
If you're feeling that same tension, the one where you know you're delivering more value than your positioning suggests, one of the most useful things you can do is find someone outside your business who can name the gap. A strategist. A coach. A peer who knows your market. Someone who can hear how you describe your work and tell you honestly where the words and the reality have parted company.
|
|
Score yourself: where do you stand?
Here's a framework I wish I'd had four years ago. Score each element from 1 to 5. Anything below 3 is your starting point.
Thought Leadership Do you publish long-form material that reveals how you think? (1 = nothing published, 5 = consistent and recognisably yours) |
Positioning Language Does your website describe what changes for your client, or what you hand them? (1 = pure deliverables, 5 = outcome-led and specific) |
Visible Methodology Can a prospect see your process before speaking to you? (1 = no visible process, 5 = named method with documented phases) |
Evidence of Outcomes Do your case studies connect the work to measurable results? (1 = no case studies, 5 = specific numbers your prospects can verify) |
Consistent Cadence Are you showing up weekly? (1 = sporadic, 5 = your audience expects it) |
Diagnostic Tool Do prospects have a way to self-assess using your thinking? (1 = none, 5 = live tool that delivers real insight) |
I've turned this into a full Strategic Partner Positioning Guide with detailed scoring, worked examples for each element, and a 90-day roadmap. It's the first asset in what I'm calling the Library of Trust. You can access it here.
|
|
News and Intelligence
The people who shape B2B deals are reading. They're just not talking to you.
The 2025 Edelman-LinkedIn report introduced a concept I think every founder should understand: the "hidden buyer." These are the people inside a buying committee who influence the decision but never speak to your sales team. 63% of them spend more than an hour a week consuming thought leadership. 79% said they're more likely to back a proposal if the company behind it consistently publishes strong thinking. And 53% said that thinking can outweigh brand recognition alone. If you're a smaller firm competing against bigger names, this is your playbook.
Understanding their world matters more than being the safest choice.
Same report. When hidden buyers were asked what matters most at the point of purchase, only 41% said "the safest choice." What mattered more: understanding of their business challenges (85%), domain expertise (74%), and strategic fit (68%). People are choosing based on whether they believe you understand their world. Not on whether your brand name feels safe.
74% of executives choose whoever frames the problem first.
ValuePros' 2026 data found that 74% of executive buyers go with the person who was first to add value and insight. This is why the published thinking, the diagnostic tools, and the frameworks matter. They put you in the conversation before the prospect has even started comparing options. By the time they speak to anyone else, the prospect is already seeing the problem through your lens.
|
|
One thing to try this week
Open your website. Read your services page as if you've never seen it before. Ask one question: does this describe what I produce, or does it describe what changes for the person who works with me?
If it reads like a menu, you're positioned as a vendor. Write one paragraph that answers: "What becomes possible for my client after we've worked together?" Keep it somewhere visible this week. That paragraph is the foundation of everything else.
|
|
|
That's Issue #3.
Issue #1 was about the cost of going quiet. Issue #2 was about finding the raw material to show up with. This one was about making sure you're showing up as the right thing. They connect: visibility without positioning is noise, positioning without consistency fades, and consistency without substance is wallpaper.
If you scored yourself on the checklist and want to talk about what came up, reply to this email. I read every one.
|
|
|
Kevan Smith
Founder, Epiphany Content
I help B2B founders turn their expertise into material that shortens sales cycles. If you're watching deals stall or getting ghosted in your pipeline, I built a few free tools that might help:
→ Trust Velocity Diagnostic (5 min)
→ Friction Audit Canvas
→ What's Your Leadership Style? Take the Quiz
LinkedIn
|
|
|
P.S. The Strategic Partner Positioning Guide is ready. Full scoring criteria, worked examples, and a 90-day roadmap for closing the gaps. It's the first asset in the Library of Trust. Access it here.
|
|
Unsubscribe from Marketing Emails | Update preferences
© 2026 Epiphany Content. Brighton, UK. {{account.mailingAddress}}
|
|